Answer: True. Reasoning:

• In most formal investigation frameworks, complainants are entitled to share or provide testimony about their experiences and the outcomes relevant to their case, while respondents (the alleged wrongdoers) are not automatically granted the same disclosure rights to the information gathered about others. The protections around privacy, fairness, and the right to a due process often result in asymmetrical access: complainants typically have access to information pertinent to their own experience, whereas respondents may have more limited access to information that could prejudice their rights or reveal sensitive details about others. This aligns with common practice in many organizational, academic, and legal investigation processes where the privacy interests of those accused are weighed against the complainant’s need for information.