It looks like you’re asking about the Enhanced Games and swimmer-related “before and after” transformations. I can summarize what’s publicly discussed and the surrounding debates, but I don’t have to rely on speculative or promotional material. Direct answer

• The Enhanced Games are a planned event in which competitors may use performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) and attempt to set world records, with substantial prize incentives. Proponents call it an experiment in openness and human potential, while critics argue it normalizes unsafe doping and undermines fair competition. This context shapes any discussion of “before and after” transformations observed in athletes connected to the event.

Key points on the swimmer angle

• Kristian Gkolomeev has been highlighted by organizers as a leading figure connected to Enhanced Games, with reported time trials around the 50m freestyle and claims of world-record-level performances in that context. The claims come from the event’s promotions and media coverage, not from universally recognized official timing bodies, so they’re controversial and not recognized as official world records.

• James Magnussen, a former world-record holder and Olympic champion, has been publicly associated with Enhanced Games discussions and has described substantial body changes during preparation. He noted rapid gains and then adjustments to training to optimize speed within the event’s framework, but these accounts are promotional/interview-based and not verifiable as standard competitive results.

• Coverage across media outlets and social channels has emphasized striking “before and after” visuals for athletes involved, but these transformations are often tied to deliberate training, nutrition, and in some cases PED use prompts from the event format. The interpretations of these changes vary widely among commentators, fans, and sports regulators.

What to keep in mind

• The Enhanced Games position themselves as a radical shift from conventional sport governance, and this framing drives much of the “before and after” narratives surrounding athletes who publicly align with the concept. The lack of official recognition for records set under PED-enabled conditions means these transformations are not treated as standard competitive benchmarks by major sport federations.

• When you see “before and after” claims, consider the source, whether the change is from training alone or includes PED-related factors, and whether any claimed results are supported by independent, official timing and anti-doping oversight. In the Enhanced Games context, official verification is not aligned with typical world-record status.

If you’d like, I can narrow this down to a specific athlete, event, or source and pull more concrete details (with dates and claimed times) from current coverage.