I don’t have tools available in this turn to pull up precise up-to-date sources, but I can answer based on general language knowledge. Direct answer

• The sequence you provided is a jumbled, ungrammatical ordering of English words. As a sentence, it does not form a coherent statement in standard grammar.
• If you intended a meaningful sentence, you could rearrange the words in several correct ways, for example:
  • The man wrote the book, and my brother. (This renders two coordinated clauses but still needs a verb for the second clause to be complete.)
  • The man wrote the book that my brother read. (Adds a relative clause to connect ideas.)
  • The man wrote the book; my brother is … (needs completion after “is”)
• If your goal is to determine grammatical roles:
  • “the man” is a noun phrase (subject of a clause if a clause exists).
  • “wrote” is a past tense verb.
  • “the book” is the direct object of “wrote.”
  • “my brother” can function as a possessor of “the book” (the book of my brother) or as an indirect object in different constructions, but in your sequence it lacks the preposition or position that would properly assign it.
• In standard English, a minimal, grammatical version could be:
  • The man wrote the book. My brother. (two simple sentences)
  • The man wrote my brother a book. (dative construction with indirect object “my brother” and direct object “a book”)

If you’d like, share the intended meaning or context (e.g., narrative, comparison, or a single sentence), and the exact grammatical role you want for each word, and it can be shaped into a natural, grammatical sentence.