Your query explores the nature of art as a form of knowledge distinct from data-driven fields. Here's a clear and thoughtful explanation based on your input:

Understanding Art as Experiential Knowledge

Unlike fields of knowledge that rely heavily on data, analysis, and abstraction, art is primarily known through direct experience. This means:

• A work of art cannot be fully understood or appreciated by simply reading about it or analyzing it intellectually.
• To truly know what an artwork is, one must engage with it through the senses — by seeing a painting, hearing a piece of music, or experiencing a performance.
• This sensory engagement is essential because art communicates through perception and emotion, not just through concepts or facts.
• Therefore, art resists being abstracted away from the actual act of experiencing it. The "doing" or "sensing" of art is part of its very essence.

Summary

In short, art is a unique form of knowledge that requires active, sensory participation rather than detached observation or data processing. To understand art, one must experience it firsthand — to see, hear, or feel it — because that experience is inseparable from the artwork itself. If you'd like, I can help you explore this idea further or provide examples illustrating this distinction!