Calipari’s departure from Kentucky was driven by a mix of on-court performance trends, evolving dynamics with the athletic department, and a timely offer that felt like a fresh, supportive fit. In brief: the program had not sustained its historical peak in recent years, and tensions over resources, facilities, NIL support, and alignment with leadership reportedly grew over time. At the same time, Arkansas presented a compelling opportunity that offered strong backing, renewed enthusiasm, and a pathway back to a setting where Calipari felt both loved and empowered to compete at a high level. Key factors often cited in reporting:

• Declining competitive trajectory at Kentucky in the late 2010s and early 2020s, including missed NCAA Tournaments and postseason disappointments, which intensified scrutiny of long-term fit and backing.

• Strained or coolly perceived relationship between Calipari and Kentucky’s athletic leadership, particularly around commitments to facilities, NIL resources, and broader program support.

• A lucrative, appealing offer from Arkansas that promised renewed energy, a strong support system, and a fresh opportunity to compete at a high level, described as a pivotal factor in his decision to move.

If you’d like, I can pull the latest detailed accounts or cross-check multiple outlets to provide a tightly sourced timeline and direct quotes from the involved parties.